logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.25 2016가합572009
손해배상(의)
Text

1. Defendant B’s KRW 10,000,000 and for this, KRW 5% per annum from March 19, 2018 to July 25, 2018, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B is a person operating a DNA urology clinic (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”); Defendant C is the head of the counseling office of the Defendant hospital; and the Plaintiff is a person who received a sex extension operation at the Defendant hospital.

B. On May 23, 2016 and May 24, 2016, the Plaintiff consulted the Defendant C on whether it is possible to expand a sexual organ once a sculpting surgery using a substitute culpology (product name: Alparum) with a phone call around eight (8) years before the Plaintiff consulted the Defendant C on whether it is possible to expand a sexual organ. Around May 25, 2016, the Plaintiff provided a phone call again to seek the location of the Defendant hospital.

C. On May 25, 2016, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant Hospital to provide consultation on the details and expenses relating to the surgery with Defendant C, and sought to do so at a level of 5m high and 20m high and length, and promised to do so with “earing, spawing, and spathing.”

On May 31, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) visited the Defendant Hospital to expand the ear; (b) revoked the extension of ear; (c) sought to provide a drinking extension surgery in order to put a substitute fluor with a height of 5-6 meters and a length of 30 meters; and (d) received a sexual extension surgery in order to put a substitute fluor with a height of 5-6 meters and a length of 30 meters into a substitute fluor (product name) from Defendant B.

(hereinafter “instant primary operation”). E.

On June 7, 2016, the Plaintiff called that the form of sexual organ is too high because of visiting the Defendant Hospital on June 7, 2016. On June 13, 2016, the Plaintiff stated that the form of sexual organ was too high. On June 13, 2016, the Plaintiff again called to the Defendant Hospital and received medical treatment at another hospital.

F. Defendant B, “The matters the Plaintiff requested,” which read, “In order to make the substitute strings in front of the substitute strings inserted by inserting the substitute strings and inserting them into two parallels,” and the contents of the surgery, “the substitute strings after inserting it into two parallels,” and “the substitute strings behind the substitute strings.”

arrow