logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.25 2014가단3700
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 25,994,012 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from August 28, 2013 to October 25, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The party-related 1) The Defendant is the “B Sung Foreign Medical Center” (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

2) The Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) is a pharmaceutical company that produces and sells written products, etc., and is a pharmaceutical company, who is a business employee belonging to the East Asia SP Co., Ltd.’s Team, and was administered by the Defendant.

B. On August 28, 2013, the Intervenor organized a program called “ballium” for the purpose of discussing and researching patient treatment through the real-time Montreal Corporation, which is intended for patients in need of leapment room and leapment therapy. 2) The Plaintiff expressed his/her intent to participate in the above program and have the Intervenor undergo patient treatment training.

As a result, the defendant taking part in the patient treatment practice of the above program as a sexual surgery, took part in the patient treatment practice of the above program, and the defendant took part in approximately 1.4ccc and approximately 0.3cc and each part of the plaintiff's judum judum (hereinafter "the procedure of this case") provided by the intervenor on the part of the plaintiff's judum.

C. 1) After the instant procedure, the Plaintiff, immediately after the instant procedure, seems to have shown a little shot sense on the left part of the face, and continue to be shot sense even after her returning home. However, the Plaintiff recognized that only one hour after the instant procedure was conducted, and the pain was commenced (as a result of the entries in evidence No. 4, the medical record for the imposition of D, stating that the medical record for the imposition of D is indicated as “suppers, pains, pains, and holes,” and the Plaintiff had a hole and a pain on the part of the instant procedure from the date of the instant procedure to the date of the instant procedure.

The Plaintiff complained of the hole and pain at the Defendant Hospital following the day, and the Defendant explained to the Plaintiff that it is a symptoms that may arise after the written treatment, and prescribed antibiotics and chronic control.

arrow