logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 04. 26. 선고 2018두32668 판결
(심리불속행) 영화에 관한 권리가 영화사로부터 문화산업전문회사로 이전되었을 뿐이고 원고의 권리가 달라지지 아니함[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-39756 ( December 13, 2017)

Title

(Trialless Conduct) The right to motion pictures has been transferred from motion picture writers to companies engaged in cultural industries, and the right of the plaintiff does not change.

Summary

(Summary of the Judgment) The disposition imposing value-added tax is unlawful on the ground that the right to motion pictures was transferred from motion picture companies to companies engaged in cultural industries, and that the status related to the Plaintiff's right to motion pictures has changed.

Related statutes

Article 1 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Cases

2018Du32668 Disposition of revocation of Value-Added Tax Imposition

Plaintiff

AAAAAA Corporation

Defendant

BB Director of the Tax Office

Imposition of Judgment

April 26, 2018

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the judgment below and the appellate brief examined the records of this case, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or are recognized to be groundless. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

.

arrow