logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 08. 30. 선고 2018두43910 판결
(심리불속행)명의도용에 해당하고 조세회피목적이 없으므로 명의신탁 증여의제 적용되지 않음[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-76182 (Law No. 18, 2018)

Title

(C) If a title trust is deemed to be a nominal trust and is not deemed to have been deemed to have been donated under a title trust without any tax avoidance purpose.

Summary

(main point of the original trial) as it constitutes a nominal deed and as it does not apply to constructive gift of title trust without any purpose of tax avoidance, taxation of gift tax is illegal.

Related statutes

Article 41-2 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act as Donation of Title Trust Property

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Reasons

All of the judgment of the court below and the records of this case were examined, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal or are recognized to be groundless. Thus, all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

August 30, 2018

arrow