logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2018.09.14 2017고정211
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. When the Defendant had filed a civil complaint with the relevant agency against the victim C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd.”) in the permanent residence of the Defendant, he had the victim Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the victim Co., Ltd.”) in mind to verify the illegal facts of the victim Co., Ltd. and the

On January 18, 2017, from around 10:42 to around 16:46 of the same day, the Defendant found the security room for the victim company's factory, which produces triluous nitrogen elements, using dangerous gas and chemical materials, such as sulfur oxide, fluoric acid, etc., and found them in front of the affairs thereof, and C, which was created at the pressure on his/her family, was overfluora; when the D legal team was operated, how there was a defect in the old direction; and C, Maminia fluora fluora fluor

In carrying out one-time demonstration with the blicket as stated above, the victim company's employees E, F, and G stay in front of the victim company's integrated security room, even if the victim company's employees were informed of the removal from the blick gas before the above company's employees handling dangerous gas and inflammable substances, the victim company's photographing of the above factory was compelled. On January 19, 2017, the victim company took one-time demonstration while carrying the blick gas in the above location, and took photographs of the above factory even though the victim company's employees were informed of the removal from the above employees on January 21, 2017. At around 10:50 of the victim company's employees, the victim company's employees and G were informed of the above factory, thereby interfering with the above company's operation and management of the factory, and the above company's employees in excess of G by force.

2. In around 11:00 on January 21, 2017, the injured Defendant sought to take photographs of the above company factory Dong as referred to in paragraph 1 of the above paragraph in the street side of the main corporation C in the permanent residence B, and as he was prevented from taking photographs from the victim G (60 years), who is the chief of the security office of the above company, the victim was pushed.

arrow