logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.09.13 2018고단2093
변호사법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and four months, Defendant B's imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, Defendant C's imprisonment with prison labor of eight months, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[B] Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Gwangju District Court on August 13, 2014 and completed the execution of the said sentence on April 1, 2015.

Defendant

C On July 27, 2017, at the Gwangju District Court sentenced the suspension of execution of one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, which became final and conclusive on September 11, 2017.

[2] From the end of June 2017, Defendant A sent the above contents to Defendant C, and Defendant C sent the above contents to Defendant C, who are related to ordinary police officers, respectively, at a non-permanent location of the 2018 high group 2093, 2018 high group 2018 high group 2658 high group 20:3:30,00,000 high group 20,000 high group 20,000 high group 20,000 high group 20,000 high group 20,000).

Defendant

D The case may be closed by making a solicitation to Defendant C and B through the line that did not work together with the F G.

The answer is delivered to Defendant A and E. After all, the Defendants received money and valuables on the pretext of solicitation or good offices with respect to the case handled by police officers from the E, and some of them conspired in order to have them divided into the acceptance cost and the acceptance cost.

According to the above public offering, Defendant A was only a metropolitan investigation unit F and Defendant B from the French Site of Gwangju or lower in July 2017 to E.

In order to resolve the case, 200 million won is required.

Some of them are delivered to the investigation team, and some of them are divided into several and high cost. On July 2017, 2017, they demanded that “Defendant B, a police officer, etc. in charge of the instant case, should drink alcohol with the police officer, etc., and 3 million won should be changed.”

arrow