logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1984. 10. 16.자 84모55 결정
[재심청구기각결정에대한재항고][공1985.1.1.(743),44]
Main Issues

The meaning of "when clear evidence is newly discovered" under Article 420 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Summary of Decision

The so-called "when clear evidence is newly discovered" as referred to in subparagraph 5 of Article 420 of the Criminal Procedure Act refers to the time when it is newly discovered, submitted or examined that the value of evidence is recognized as objective superior to that of other evidence, which is not discovered or it was impossible to submit or examine even if it was discovered in the final and conclusive litigation procedures subject to review.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 420 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act

Reference Cases

81Mo12 delivered on May 25, 1981

Re-appellant

Re-appellant

United States of America

Gwangju District Court Order 84No2 dated September 5, 1984

Text

The reappeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of reappeal are examined.

The so-called "when a clear evidence is newly discovered" as referred to in Article 420 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act refers to the evidence that was not discovered in the litigation procedure of a final judgment subject to review or that it was impossible to submit or examine even if it was discovered, and whose value of evidence is recognized as an objective superior to that of other evidence, which is the time when the new evidence is discovered, submitted, or examined (see, e.g., Supreme Court Order 81Mo12, May 25, 1981). For the same reason, it is difficult for a witness who is a new evidence cited by the applicant for review to regard it as falling under the evidence under Article 420 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and thus, it is justifiable in light of the record that the measures against which the request for review

Therefore, the reappeal is dismissed without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices Yoon Il-young (Presiding Justice) Gangwon-young Kim Young-ju

arrow