logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2018.08.09 2018고합5
뇌물수수
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of three years and fine of 80,000,000 won, Defendant B’s fine of 6,000,000 won, Defendant C’s fine of 8,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Dissenting Facts] Defendant A is a person who served as the head of D Gun from April 24, 2013 to June 15, 2018 and has personnel authority over public officials belonging to D Gun; Defendant B was appointed as public officials belonging to D Gun from December 16, 197 to public officials belonging to D Gun from January 11, 2012, and served as public officials of Grade V local public officials of Grade V in the civil petition division from D Gun office from January 11, 2012, and was promoted as public officials of Grade V in Grade V, public officials of Grade V in the local government from January 1, 2014, and public officials of Grade V 1 to 3 in the F 1, 2015; Defendant C is a person who served as public officials of Grade V in the military on December 31, 2016 to Grade V, and Defendant C is a public official of Grade V and Grade V in the general affairs of Grade V from Grade V local public officials of Grade D 2 to Grade V local government.

[Criminal facts]

1. On December 27, 2013, from around 14:30 to 16:00 on the same day, Defendant B was demanded to prepare and deliver KRW 20 million in return for the personnel affairs of Defendant A to the head of the Gun office at the D military office located in Gyeongnam-do.

At around 21:30 on the same day, the Defendant met Ha, the chief secretary of K High School, H, the chief of K High School, and H, the cash amounting to KRW 20 million in the paper room, and H immediately found L as L’s house.

Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe in relation to the public official's duties.

2. On July 2014, 2014, Defendant C: (a) heard the awareness that the Defendant was determined to be subject to promotion in relation to the promotion of Grade V public officials of D military service in the latter part of D in the first half of the year of 2014; and (b) was willing to deliver a honorarium to A in order to clarify the Defendant’s promotion.

Accordingly, the defendant.

arrow