Defendant

A and B Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant C for eight months, respectively.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Western District Court on July 4, 2013, and two years of probation, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 14, 2013. On August 13, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and two years of suspension of execution for fraud, etc. on the support of Sungnam District Court, which was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution and became final and conclusive on August 21, 2014. Defendant C was sentenced to one year and two years of suspension of execution and two years of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Western District Court on July 4, 2013 and became final and conclusive on July 12, 2013; Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Regulation of Similar Act at the Seoul Western District Court on February 9, 2015, and each of the grace periods became final and conclusive on February 17, 2015.

Criminal facts

Defendant

B The F Co., Ltd. F (hereinafter referred to as “F”) for the purpose of consulting business start-up.

The director and the SK Startup Team leader and the defendant A, while working as the head of F department, have been engaged in investment mediation against F customers in addition to start-up consulting. On February 2010, the defendant C, who was the actual operator of G and H for the purpose of selling and distributing clothes, promised to attract the investment to the defendant C and to receive some of the investment funds from the defendant C, after being requested by the defendant C to attract investment attraction.

From the end of April 2010, the Defendants concluded to the effect that, at the F Office located in the third floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul International Building in Gangnam-gu, the Defendants would make it false to the effect that “The C president operating G B is the Korean monopoly agent of the U.S. U.S. U.S. U.S. brand, “I. O. O. O. O.T.C.,” and that, at the same time, the Defendants would make a settlement of the investment profit of KRW 2.5 million per month of the old unit (50 million), the Defendants would make a settlement of the investment profit of KRW 2.5 million per month of the old unit (50 million) in order to attract three old units, because they would have prepared for the salted products.”