Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

Defendant

B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court on May 9, 2007, and on March 28, 2008, the parole period expired on May 7, 2008.

On September 25, 2012, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced five years of imprisonment for fraud, etc., and the judgment was finalized on November 21, 2012. On November 29, 2012, the Seoul Western District Court sentenced ten months to imprisonment for fraud, etc. on January 23, 2013. On October 11, 2013, the judgment was finalized on January 7, 2014 after being sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court. On November 5, 2015, the judgment was finalized on November 13, 2015.

"2016 Highest 2707"

1. Defendant A, Defendant B’s fraud, and Defendant B conspired with H on October 20, 209, at the J real estate office located in Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu Seoul around October 20, 2009, H requires money to the victim G to expand this restaurant.

It is difficult to write a letter that the head of the family is responsible for the head of the family, and it is false to the purport that B lending KRW 80 million to B as security for the deposit of KRW 50 million. Defendant B is living in the victim on a deposit basis of KRW 80 million, and there is a need to pay money to the present restaurant in order to transfer its expansion because of narrowness.

During 2 to 3 months of death in Incheon, Nr. N. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. 20 million won.

The remainder will be repaid when funeral services are performed well by the restaurants.

It is false to the purport that “B” and Defendant A has received KRW 80 million as a deposit for the lease on a deposit basis, and Defendant A has lent KRW 50 million to B.

If B fails to repay the borrowed money, it was false to the effect that B would be responsible for and repaid.

However, in fact, the main contents of the Defendants are “the lessor A, the lessee B, and the deposit amount of 80 million won” with respect to K 402 of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.