logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.12 2017고단4423
사기
Text

Defendant

A, B, and C shall be punished by imprisonment for two months.

However, the defendant B and C for each year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] Defendant A was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on December 22, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 15, 2017. On May 17, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on May 19, 2017 and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 19, 2017.

Defendant

C On July 7, 2016, the Seoul Central District Court was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for six months due to fraud, etc. on July 15, 2016.

Defendant

B On July 7, 2016, the Seoul Central District Court was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on July 15, 2016.

[2] On January 7, 2014, the co-defendant F served as the representative director of G agricultural partnership G established for the purpose of agricultural product processing and packing business, etc., and from July 2014, the co-defendant F has been attracting investment from around July 2014 to promote the online game site operation business, etc. other than the above G G’s establishment purpose, and has been managing the entire investment business, such as the deposit and withdrawal of investment money.

Defendant

A, while serving as a director of the above G, was in charge of investment explanation for the online game site operation business for investors.

Defendant

C as the head of the above G-affiliated Center in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City H building No. 706, the head of the above G-affiliated Center was in charge of the duties, such as explaining investment to the customers of Seoul Nowon-gu and attracting investment funds from customers.

Defendant

B worked as a director of the above Center, and was in charge of investment explanation duties for investors in the above online game site operation business.

The Defendants conspired to commit an act in collusion with the Defendants that did not have the intent or ability to conduct an online game site operation business, and that, when attracting investment money, the Defendants are bound to repeat the term “refiscing the return” of the investment principal and interest to the preceding investors. Accordingly, the said G is obliged to repay the investment principal and interest to the investors.

arrow