logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1995. 2. 10. 선고 94다51895 판결
[손해배상(자)][공1995.3.15.(988),1320]
Main Issues

Where a victim injured by a primary accident dies from another secondary accident, the scope of compensation by the person causing the primary accident shall be limited.

Summary of Judgment

Where a victim injured by an accident dies due to another accident, if there is no such contractual relationship as deemed that the second accident would not have occurred even if the second accident had not occurred between the two accidents, the perpetrator of the second accident should compensate only for the damage until the victim died due to the second accident.

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 763 and 393 of the Civil Act

Reference Cases

[Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee] Plaintiff 1 and 2 others (Law Firm Gyeong, Attorneys Park Dong-young et al., Counsel for plaintiff-appellant-appellant-appellee)

Plaintiff-Appellant

Plaintiff

Defendant-Appellee

Defendant

Judgment of the lower court

Changwon District Court Decision 94Na1160 delivered on September 9, 1994

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiff.

Reasons

As to the Grounds of Appeal

If the victim injured by an accident dies due to another accident, if there is no such condition as the fact that the second accident would not have occurred between the two accidents, the perpetrator of the second accident shall compensate for only the damage until the victim died due to the second accident (see Supreme Court Decision 79Da156 delivered on April 24, 1979). The court below acknowledged the fact that the non-party, the inheritee of the plaintiff, was killed due to a traffic accident under the judgment of the defendant on December 26, 1992, after recognizing that the non-party, who was the deceased, was killed due to another traffic accident under the judgment of the defendant on August 25, 1993, the court below determined only the actual profit of the above non-party due to the second accident of this case until the death of the second accident of this case, and there is no reason to argue that there is any error in the theory of lawsuit.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing plaintiff. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Kim Jong-sik (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-창원지방법원 1994.9.9.선고 94나1160