1. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) is subject to paragraphs 1 through 3 and 4-B of the attached list.

each. described in paragraph 1.

A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed a principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 24, 2013, the Plaintiff and C (the spouse of the Plaintiff) enter into the instant contract with the Defendant and D, each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 6 through 8 (hereinafter “each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 6 through 8,” and the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 to 5 (hereinafter “real estate”) and the Defendant and D owners.

(2) The Plaintiff entered into the instant contract and agreed to restore the real estate No. 7 between the Defendant and the Defendant to farmland in which his rice shed can be located. (2) On January 6, 2014, D completed the registration of ownership transfer on each real estate No. 4-A and No. 5, and the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the same day to D, and the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the real estate No. 8. (c) On June 2014, the Plaintiff transferred the real estate No. 7 to the Defendant as farmland and transferred the real estate to the Defendant. [based on recognition] The Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the real estate No. 1, 3-6, and No. 1 (including each number, hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry, witness E, or F's testimony, the whole purport of the pleading

2. As to the principal lawsuit

A. According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of exchange on November 24, 2013, with respect to the real estate in each of the subparagraphs 1 through 3 and 4-B under the instant contract. 2) The Defendant is the Plaintiff’s third party from the Plaintiff.

B. (1) The plaintiff's defense of simultaneous performance is not possible until the amount of damages is paid to KRW 51,884,401 as stated in paragraph (1). However, there is no evidence to prove that the plaintiff's above compensation obligation and the defendant's above obligation to transfer ownership is concurrently performed. Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit. (B) The plaintiff's assertion as to the claim for damages, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, and the 59.2 million won