logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.10.18 2016가단2989
부동산인도 등
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

(a) Defendant B is the real estate set out in [Attachment 2] Nos. 1 and 2;

B. Defendant C is attached Form 2.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and

(Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 in the list of real property in Appendix 2)

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. According to the part of the claim against Defendant D, the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant D on May 3, 2016, on the premise that Defendant D is the owner of the above real estate, was completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 4, 2016 after Defendant D sold the real estate No. 2 No. 15 to Defendant D’s acquiring intervenor on May 3, 2016. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant D on the premise that Defendant D is the owner of the above real estate is groundless.

arrow