(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.05.12 2015고단444

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.05.12 2015고단444

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 50,000 won and imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, it shall be gold.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 24, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. in the Gwangju District Court's Netcheon Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 1, 2012.

1. On March 2012, 2012, the Defendant damaged a glass door owned by the victim by the Defendant on the ground that other tenants living together in the victim D’s house leased by the Defendant was sleeped and sleeped to the 1st floor glass door so that the 2.80,000 won of the repair cost can be destroyed by slicking the 1st floor glass door.

2. Interference with business;

A. On July 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 17:00, at the “F” restaurant operated by the victim D in 17:0, the Defendant lost smells from the restaurant, and obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force, such as: (b) the Defendant snicking the Defendant at the restaurant side; and (c) snicking the Defendant with a large amount of music stored in his/her Handphones and 30 minutes of music while putting about 30 minutes of music stored in his/her Handphones.

B. From around 17:00 on March 18, 2015 to 18:10 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) diced the victim’s disease boomed with the victim’s frank with the victim’s frank, and (b) frank with another customer who would not drink; and (c) frank with the customer, and (d) frank with the victim’s frank with the victim, and the victim was the victim and the Defendant.

The Defendant: (a) sought the Defendant’s Hand phone cases; (b) left the said restaurant; (c) returned to the said restaurant; and (d) opened the beer’s house from other customers with the said actions, and opened the entrance by gathering the beer’s disease on the table; and (c) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force over one hour.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of D;

1.On-site photographs of F cafeterias, and CCTVs of F cafeterias.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 안동지원 2017.05.19 2017고단134

-대구지방법원서부지원 2020.10.15 2020고단1228

-인천지방법원 2017.06.14 2017고단2735

-대구지방법원 포항지원 2015.09.24 2015고단518

-광주지방법원순천지원 2020.12.10 2020고단1242