A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 22, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Cheongju District Court on the grounds of the violation of the Road Traffic Act. On February 19, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3,50,000 to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Cheongju District Court on the grounds of the violation of the Road Traffic Act. On December 30, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 7,00,000 to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On May 8, 2015, at around 09:15, the Defendant driven a wing-Cwing-Cwinging vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.06% under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license from the front day of the Seo-gu Seo-gu Seo-si, Seog-si to the front day of the Pyeongtaek-gu located in the same Dong.

2. The Defendant, as stated in paragraph (1) at the date and time, and paragraph (1) at a place, should be punished when the Defendant was discovered by drinking-free driving from a policeman belonging to the Transport Control Department of the considerable police station while driving under influence without a license, as stated in paragraph (1), and it should be punished by C, thereby making C enter the Defendant’s pro-friendly resident registration number in the Defendant’s report on the statement of the state-friendly driver’s situation, making C enter the above DNA’s personal information in the report on the state-friendly driver’s situation, signing the “D” in the driver’s report on the state-employed driver’s situation, and then

The defendant continued to enter C's personal information in the notification of the result of the drinking driving control of PDA terminal devices, and after signing D's name next to the D's name of PDA terminal, the defendant submitted C.

Accordingly, the defendant forged the D's signature and exercised it for the purpose of exercising it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Notification of the result of the control of drinking driving under D name signed by the defendant, and reports on the state of drinking drivers, licenses, and making an inquiry into the motor vehicle register;

1. Previous convictions as indicated in the judgment: Criminal history records, inquiry reports (A) and criminal investigation reports (verification of criminal records of sound driving) shall apply to the Act and subordinate statutes;