logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2014.12.09 2013가단3526
약정금
Text

1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for 60,000,000 won and the period from November 16, 2010 to December 9, 2014.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A. On March 2009, Ansan-si received an “distribution of the supply quantity of the industrial complex in 2009” from Gyeonggi-do to develop the Filty as an industrial complex in Ansan-si. The executor of the said development project is a company D (hereinafter “D”) in which G is the representative director.

(C) Around August 2009, F, one of the planned industrial complex development sites, was F, one of the F, one of the planned industrial complex development sites, on the ground that the shortage of industrial facility sites was predicted, and thus, was approved on September 1, 2009 by Gyeonggi-do on the ground that “request for approval of a change in the quantity of supply of the industrial complex in 2009” was changed as of September 1, 2009, and notified it to D on October 1, 2009.

3) E industrial complex development projects (hereinafter “instant development projects”)

(4) G established Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) for the purpose of the industrial complex development project of Hwon in Ansan-si, and registered himself as an internal director, and applied for approval to change the above Defendant B to the operator of the instant development project on December 2009, but withdrawn on June 2010.

5) Next, the operator of the instant development project changes into S&S Co., Ltd. and is currently underway. (B) The Plaintiff is a Ma, who is a single owner or an equity holder of the instant development project (hereinafter collectively collectively referred to as “instant real estate”), located within the instant development project site, and is a 26,578 square meters of I forest and field, J 2,026 square meters, K ditch 274 square meters, and L 347 square meters (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant real estate”).

2) As seen earlier, Defendant B is a corporation that was the implementor of the instant development project, and Defendant C is a person engaged in the business of purchasing real estate, etc. in the prospective site for the instant development project under the name of N. 3) The Plaintiff and the Defendants on July 28, 2010, respectively.

arrow