1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. Attached Form 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance omitted.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts written or added, thereby citing this case as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The 2nd two pages of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "the Plaintiff's ownership" and "the Defendant's ownership".

The two-way 5 side of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be referred to as "purchase" and shall be referred to as "purchase."

Under the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the above 28-4 forest land "the above 28-4 forest land" shall be added to "the land before division".

The 3rd 10th 10th son of the first instance judgment “Defendant” was written by the Plaintiff “ro,” “B”.

In the judgment of the court of first instance, the part “A” up to 11 to 14 pages 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance refers to only the sale of the land that was created after the development act, and it does not include the sale of the land before the development act, but rather, the defendant cannot find the grounds to limit or interpret the part “C submitted a confirmation of facts under the name of the defendant that “C has delegated the right to develop and sell the land before the division to C,” and the investigator in charge verified the authenticity, etc. of a confirmation of facts by directly communicating with the defendant. On June 20, 2017, the Seoul Northern District Prosecutors’ Office No. 2017-type 28475). On the other hand, the defendant alleged that “sale” in the confirmation of facts as mentioned above means only the sale of the land that was created after the development act, and the sale of the land before the development act was not included, and the defendant prepared the confirmation of facts that C delegated the right to enter into a sales contract of the land of this case from the defendant.” The defendant further asserted 35.