logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원(춘천) 2020.11.16 2020누348
임금
Text

Among the judgment of the first instance, the part against the plaintiff ordering payment shall be revoked.

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 4,813,130.

Reasons

1. The part concerning “the occurrence of the obligation to pay unpaid allowance” and “the occurrence of the obligation to pay unpaid allowance” and “the determination of the Defendant’s assertion” in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance which partly accepted the part of the judgment is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance 6 to 7 , 16 to 17 , 13 through 21 , 13 through 21 , in addition to the part concerning which the part concerning “the occurrence of the obligation to pay unpaid allowance” and “the occurrence of the obligation to pay unpaid allowance” among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act

The 10th two pages of the first instance judgment "2, 201" shall be applied to "1 January 201".

The second 19,20 pages 19, 20 of the first instance judgment, “The difference between the hours of overtime work, night work, and holiday work, which have to be paid to the defendant, and the allowances already paid, shall be sought from January 2, 2011 to June 2012, 201,” shall be construed as “the difference between the allowances already paid to the defendant during overtime work, night work, and holiday work, which have to be paid to the defendant, shall be sought from the defendant (the plaintiff shall additionally seek payment of the difference between the allowances of January 201 when the appellate court reaches the court).”

The 3rd written judgment of the first instance court "3. Judgment" shall be applied to "4. Judgment".

The 3rd written judgment of the first instance is deleted. The 8th written judgment of the first instance is “A. Judgment on the Defendant’s argument” in the 16th written judgment of the first instance court. The 8th written judgment of the first instance court is “A. Judgment on the Defendant’s argument.” The 21th written judgment of the first instance court is “A. Judgment on the Defendant’s argument.” The 21th written judgment of the first instance court is written by adding the calculation details table in the attached Form of this judgment. 2. The newly used part of the 2th judgment (the 7th judgment of the first instance

(1) According to the provisions of the aforementioned relevant Acts and subordinate statutes as seen earlier, wages per hour of overtime work in 201 shall be 59% (amount of salary base) of the base salary ±26 x 150%, wages per hour of night work in 201 shall be 59% (amount of salary base) of the base salary ±26 x 50% of the base salary ± (amount of salary base) of the base salary ± 226 x 50%.

arrow