Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 7, 2014, at Seoul Mapo-gu, Defendant A: (a) sent out after receiving a report of assault, the police officer F belonging to the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu, Seoul Mapo-gu, Seoul Mapo-gu, Police Station E-gu, controlled and separated fighting between the Defendant and his women-friendly B, the other party G, and H; and (b) Defendant F took a bath, such as “Chewing gue, embs, and bits,” and interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties regarding the treatment of 112 reports, etc.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article, the police officer F arrested the above Party A as a flagrant offender and prevented him from driving ahead of the defective patrol vehicle in order to take aboard the patrol vehicle, and the F demanded the Defendant to turn off from the patrol vehicle, the Defendant refused it and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to criminal investigation, etc.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Each statement of F in the F of this Court, each protocol of examination of the witness to I, and F in the protocol of examination of the witness to I (the presentation of the fifth protocol of trial);

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. A written statement of I [Defendant B]

1. Each legal statement of witness F, H and I;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the I;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime;

1. Defendant A: Defendant B who has chosen to imprisonment with prison labor: Selection of fine;

1. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act in the custody of a workhouse (Defendant B);

1. Suspension of execution (Defendant A) Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following consideration shall be given in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendants and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the assertion is only the fact that the defendant A unilaterally reported to G and H at the time of the instant case, and that he reported to 112.