logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2019.10.31 2019고단1335
축산물위생관리법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who sells meat in the name of “C” in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.

No person shall sell livestock products, the expiration date marked on the relevant livestock products, or store them for sale.

Nevertheless, on May 3, 2019, the Defendant kept 96.052 km in the cooling room of the said Livestock Products Center for the purpose of selling 6.5 km, the distribution period of which is indicated as of April 26, 2019, including 6.5 km, 14.2 km, 11.9 km, 4.7 km, 13 km of the front bridge, 14.352 km, and 16.052 km of the said Livestock Products Center.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Letter of accusation or accusation of violations of the Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act, and the weight and circulation period of meat in custody, sales establishments and meat photographs;

1. Application of statutes on business registration certificates;

1. Relevant provisions for facts constituting an offense and Articles 45 (1) 7 and 33 (1) 8 of the Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act (Selection of Imprisonment or imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, which acknowledges and reflects the defendant's mistake, the defendant committed the crime of this case again despite the fact that he had been punished twice by a fine due to the same kind of crime. The period of circulation, the number of days and the amount of storage of this case, and other defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, and other various conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case shall be determined as ordered by taking into account.

arrow