[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 9, 2018, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for a crime of violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (mediation of business act, etc.) at the Suwon Franchising Station on February 9, 2018, and Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for eight months for a crime of violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (mediation of business act, etc.) at the Suwon Franchising Station on February 9, 2018, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 6, 2018.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A

A. On October 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was in possession of DK 3 automobiles from DK F by visiting the Defendant at contact with the Defendant in the vicinity of the Revised Station located in the DK3’s seat; (b) the unlawful uttering of the official document related to DK3’s car; (c) the forgery of the official document; and (d) the forgery of the private document; and (c) the Defendant was in possession of DK 3 automobiles from DK F.

G's driver's license, resident registration certificate, and the defendant act as G, and the above F, who is aware of the fact, presented that he completed the first-class ordinary driver's license of G in the name of the Gyeonggi-do Police Agency in the name of the official document, and resident registration certificate in the Ansan-si market, as if the defendant's driver's license and resident registration certificate are the defendant's driver's license and resident registration certificate. The above F made F enter "K3" in the name column, "G's name column," and "G's name column" in the tenant's name column, and sign on the name of the tenant.

Accordingly, the Defendant denied the official document, and forged a copy of the vehicle lease contract in the name of G, which is a private document on rights and obligations, for the purpose of uttering.

(2) The Defendant exercised the said investigation document by delivering the forged vehicle lease agreement to F as if it was a document duly formed, at the time, at the same time, and at the same place as that of the above A, and at the same time and place.

(b)the unlawful uttering of official documents relating to I K5 rental car;