1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance court's judgment, except in cases where a part of the judgment of the first instance is rewritten or added as stated in the following 2. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2.In the fourth and fourth parts of the judgment of the first instance, the following shall be added:

According to the respective statements and the overall purport of arguments in Eul evidence Nos. 3 and 4, the defendants and defendant C of the first instance court were found to have been subject to a disposition that was not suspected of being suspected of being "as alleged in the plaintiff's assertion, there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge embezzlement, and rather, C may be deemed to have borrowed each of the above money from the plaintiff in the criminal case of embezzlement committed by the plaintiff at the Seoul Dong District Prosecutors' Office on August 12, 2005."

At the fourth side of the judgment of the court of first instance, two copies of "13" shall be re-written with "15".

3. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants of this case is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit.