(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.04.10 2014나43085

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.04.10 2014나43085

정정보도 등

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except in cases where the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is rewritten or added as stated in the following 2. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Re-written or added by the first instance court's second and second instance court's second and fifth instance court's second and second instance court's second and second instance court's second and second instance court's second and second instance court's second and second instance court's second and second instance court's "It is true or true, and there is a considerable reason to believe that it is true or true, and the plaintiff's property formation and morality

On June 24, 2014, the application was rejected on June 24, 2014.

The defendant's defense is without merit, since Article 14 (3) of the Press Arbitration Act provides that the request for a corrective report does not require the illegality of a press organization, etc., under the 9th sentence of the first instance court's decision.

From the 7th sentence to the 4th sentence of the first instance court, the first one shall be followed as follows:

1) As seen earlier, it is reasonable to view that the Defendant infringed upon the Plaintiff’s social evaluation by reporting the articles of this case containing false contents, and thereby, it is obvious in light of the empirical rule that the Plaintiff suffered mental suffering, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to compensate for the damages suffered by the Plaintiff as consolation money. 2) The Defendant asserts that the content of each of the articles of this case is true for the public interest and its purpose was believed to be for the public interest, and that there was considerable reason to believe that the content of the article of this case is true, and thus,

Cases where the media, such as newspapers, injures the reputation of individuals by pointing out facts.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

-언론중재 및 피해구제 등에 관한 법률 제14조 제3항

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2019.01.30 2018나2049551

-서울북부지방법원 2017.12.12 2017나31102

-서울고등법원 2016.01.15 2015나2020764

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.27 2017나20974

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.12 2017나20479