logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.05.23 2019고단62
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant

The imprisonment with prison labor for A shall be three months, and the imprisonment for Defendant B shall be eight months, respectively.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant: (a) failed to secure a budget of approximately KRW 20 billion by the Committee for Promotion of the Urban Environment Improvement Project (hereinafter “Promotion Committee”) which is the implementer of the redevelopment and improvement project for private documents; (b) failed to pay business compensation, relocation expenses, etc. to the operators of commercial sex acts establishments; (c) had a person who operated commercial sex acts establishments waive the operation of commercial sex acts establishments; and (d) had a person who operated commercial sex acts establishments waive his/her operation; and (e) had the Defendant applied for a false business compensation

The Defendant, in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, had the F who operated a sexual traffic business place waives his business, prepared a false document as if the Defendant had a sexual traffic business place operated in the store F and received business compensation. However, in order to receive business compensation, there was a need to prove that the former F was actually engaged in sexual traffic in order to receive business compensation, he had the F intent to forge the store lease contract in the name of F.

Accordingly, at the office of G Licensed Real Estate Agent on June 2016, the Defendant arbitrarily posted the first name and F’s personal seal on the real estate lease contract form, using the pentle, stating the “Seoul Dongdaemun-gu E”, “O million, 500,000,00”, “one million,000,000,” “the delivery date of real estate”, “the delivery date of real estate,” “any condition that is unredevelopmented without any condition”, “H”, “I”, “resident resident registration numberJ”, “B”, and “F”, and then arbitrarily affixed the first name and F’s personal seal on their own name.

Accordingly, the defendant forged the lease contract in the name of I and F, which is a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

B. The Defendant on September 1, 2016 delegated the authority to implement an urban environment improvement project in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul.

arrow