logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.10.15 2015고단2385
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On February 6, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Busan District Court, and was sentenced to one year for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on June 3, 2015, and was sentenced to one year for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Red Sexual Support of the Daejeon District Court on July 13, 2015, and the said sentence became final and conclusive on July

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around September 15, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) and driven CM5 cars without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 500 meters from the Brato the front road of the national bank located in the same Dong from the Bramo 5-dong, Busan Soksan-gu, Busan, to a level of 500 meters.

2. No person who violates the Resident Registration Act shall use another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

On September 21, 2014, around 15:35, the Defendant was found to have been operating a passenger bank in front of the National Bank located in the 5-dong, Seosan-gu, Busan on September 21, 2014, and was discovered to have failed to wear the seat belt, and the Defendant called the E’s resident registration number, which was requested to present the driver’s license from the slope D belonging to the Busan Urban Police Station, as his resident registration number.

In this respect, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as indicated in the foregoing 2. Paragraph 2., stated “E” to be exercised in the criminal identification column of the offender report, and signed next to the name of the Defendant.

4. The Defendant, at the same time and place as indicated in the above 2. Paragraph 2., issued to the assistant DNA as described in the above 2. Paragraph 2., who was unaware of the fact, a written report on the offender exposure stating the forged signature in the same manner as the above 3. Paragraph 3., and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The name “F” in No. 2 of the D Evidence List is the clerical error in “D”.

Each police officer for E.

arrow