logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.02.09 2016고단1813
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The defendant shall obtain money from the applicant C to the applicant C in the amount of KRW 202,00,00,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 1813] When the Defendant was unable to pay a large amount of money due to the occurrence of an illegal sports earth and sand gambling, the Defendant charged the amount of money on credit with the e-mail “glury” and “Tatn” at the point of first convenience in Ansan-si, and raised the money on credit through the Internet to be commercialized by transferring it to another person through the Internet and to be used for the illegal sports earth and sand financing.

On September 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the F convenience store operated by the victim E in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and (b) at the time of receiving money from the injured party, the fact, despite having no intent or ability to pay the money from the injured party; (c) made a false statement to the victim stating that “the injured party would pay the money after paying for capital,” and was charged KRW 50,000 to the Defendant’s smartphone case installed in the Defendant’s smartphone from the injured party.

In addition, from around that time to October 2016, the Defendant was charged KRW 13,935,000 in total with nine victims about the Defendant’s “grasium” and “Tman’s money” over 284 times in total, as described in the list of crimes in the attached Table of Crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings victims to acquire financial benefits.

[2016 Highest 1896] The Defendant sent KRW 1.6 million in cash to the victim D from the Defendant’s residence located in Ansan-gu G and 101 on September 15, 2016 to the Nonghyup (Account Number H) account, and then sent KRW 1.9 million in cash to the Defendant for gifting KRW 1.9 million in the case of a transportation card capital.

The phrase ‘State' was false.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have an electronic monetary “glurine” that the Defendant transferred to the victim, and was used for the repayment of his/her personal debt or gambling funds, so there was no intention or ability to pay the “glurine” from the beginning.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and makes the same account as the victim on the same day.

arrow