A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

In light of the above legal principles, the Defendant, at the time of the Defendant’s racing, is a person who is engaged in the construction business in the name of the Defendant.

1. On September 21, 2011, the Defendant forged a private document by using an official approval color pen on the paper of the goods contract operated by F in the G (State) office located in E on the racing-si on September 21, 201, stating “I” in the column of the address of joint and several sureties without authority, “I” in the telephone column, “I” in the name column, “L” in the resident number column, and L” in the name column, and signed L.

As a result, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged one copy of the goods supply contract, which became a joint and several surety in the name of L, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and forged four copies of the goods supply contract, which became a joint and several surety in the name of another person in the same manner as shown in attached Table 1, from the time to October 10, 2012.

2. On September 21, 201, the Defendant: (a) around September 21, 201, at the G office operated by F in E on the racing, delivered a forged L contract for the supply of goods with joint and several surety under the name of L, as described in paragraph (1), to M, an employee of G (owner) who knew of the forgery, and used it as if it was duly formed; and (b) thereafter, exercised four copies of the forged goods supply contract, as described in attached Table 1, from January 10, 201 to January 10, 201.

3. On September 21, 2011, the Defendant issued a false contract for supply of forged goods, such as paragraphs 1 and 2, in the process of concluding a contract for supply of goods with the victim F, who is an employee of the victim, at the G office (main office) operated by the victim F, Young-si, the Defendant, as of September 21, 201, to supply the building materials and immediately pay the price after the completion of the construction work.

However, in the case of the 7 small-scale housing construction in which the defendant had been at the time, more costs were invested than the originally anticipated, and this is the victim.