logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2020.10.14 2020노182
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복상해등)등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The court below's summary of the judgment of the court below was prosecuted as a charge of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (However, since the facts charged against the defendant are separate charges from the facts charged in this case, it is not an accomplice relation), the probation order was sentenced to 2 years in October, and the probation order was sentenced, but the judgment of the court below became final and conclusive as it did not

In the lower judgment, the part against A among the judgment of the lower court is excluded.

1) The Defendant was indicted for two concurrent cases as follows. [2019Gohap50] ① Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes”: (a) the Defendant reported the victim I (49 years of age to an investigation agency) who was friendly with the Defendant, and arrested him to the police, and found the victim. When the victim was released, the Defendant expressed a desire for the victim. (b) The Defendant expressed a threat to the effect that “A’s rear distribution is in preparation for knife for knife for knife,” and (c) expressed a threat to the effect that “A’s rear distribution is in preparation for knife for knife for knife for 10 days by assaulting the victim.” (b) The Defendant did not recognize the Defendant’s 7 years of age as having been tried to her female employees and tried to do so for 7 years of age 1,000, on the ground that he did not have any ever been tried for 2000.

arrow