1. The Defendant: KRW 112,525,680, Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff C respectively; KRW 1,500,000 and KRW 375,000 for Plaintiff D and each of the above.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A was enrolled in F High School around 2018, while Plaintiff B and C were the parents of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff D were the births of Plaintiff A.

The defendant is a corporation established pursuant to Article 15 of the Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for School Safety Accidents (hereinafter referred to as the "School Safety Act"), which is a school safety mutual aid business operator to which the head of the F High School belongs

B. On June 16, 2018, Plaintiff A suffered from an accident that knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee,

C. The Defendant recognized the instant accident as a school safety accident and paid medical care benefits to the Plaintiff A.

On January 16, 2019, the doctor G of Ansan Hospital of the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service issued a written diagnosis of a later disability on January 16, 2019, stating, “In comparison with the left-hand (hand side) knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kn

E. On the request of this Court for physical appraisal, I testified that “There is no strong position on the right side for the diagnosis and radioactive examination of October 2, 2019, but there is an oral instability (for the left side in the clinical observation opinion and the radioactive stress examination, there is a difference of approximately three meters in the left side in the clinical observation opinion, about eight meters in the face of the back side in the visual stress, and about five meters in the right side in the face of the back side in the Mabro labor capability evaluation table, if I will be an ordinary outdoor employee, it will be presumed that the rate of permanent loss of labor force of approximately 9.7% in the right side is visible by applying mutatis mutandis to Section IV-1/3 of Section IV-1 of the Enforcement Decree of the School Safety Act.” In applying Table 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the School Safety Act, it is reasonable to apply mutatis mutandis the Rule 12th 7 of the School Safety Act.”

[Reasons for Recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 9, and this Court's H Hospital President (I).