beta
Text
1. The defendant's 102,338,184 won, Plaintiff B, and C respectively, and 375,000 won, respectively, to Plaintiff D, and E. respectively.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. 1) Plaintiff A is a student who was enrolled in G High School on 2017. 2) Plaintiff B and C is a student’sless journal of Plaintiff A, Plaintiff D is a mother of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff E is a mother of Plaintiff A and the mother of Plaintiff E.
3) The Defendant’s Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for School Safety Accidents (hereinafter “School Safety Act”)
b) On June 2, 2017, the Plaintiff A was diagnosed on June 5, 2017, as an accident that was going beyond a farming field in the playground at school sports hours (hereinafter “instant accident”), and was diagnosed on the first half of the upper right slot line, the first half of the first half of the lower right slot line and the second half of the lower right slot line, and was diagnosed on June 5, 2017.
2) The Defendant decided to pay the deductible benefits for the medical expenses incurred in relation to the instant accident. C. The Plaintiffs filed the instant lawsuit against the Defendant claiming that the Plaintiff had a disability that occurred after the instant accident. The Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the Defendant claiming disability benefits (actual profit and consolation money) under the School Safety Act, and a duplicate of the complaint was served on July 11, 2018.
2) The court entrusted H Hospital with the physical appraisal of the Plaintiff A. The results and the results of the subsequent fact-finding inquiry inquiry reply are as follows. - The right knee, when the right knee is exposed to self-finding, complaining of the appeal that it might be unfeasible. Although there is no strength of the right sel in terms of diagnosis and the radiation science examination, there is a pressure of the cryp and the operation department, but there is a pressure of the hump and the hump of the hump (the left side of the hump in the clinical examination, the opinion of the opinion of clinical examination and the pre-disaster stress examination, show a difference of about 1m and about 5m in the face of the humphe 6m and the hume m in the face of the hume hume. The hume in the face of the hume humphe.