1. The defendant's 83,651,445 won, Plaintiff B, and C respectively, and 375,000 won, respectively, to Plaintiff D, and E. respectively.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) Plaintiff A is a student of F High School, Plaintiff B and C is the parent of Plaintiff A, Plaintiff D is the sibling of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff E is the mother of Plaintiff A. 2) The Defendant is a corporation established pursuant to the Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for School Safety Accidents (hereinafter “School Safety Act”), which is a business operator of the school safety accident compensation deduction to which the F High School Head has entered.

나. 사고의 발생 및 요양급여의 지급 1) 원고 A은 2016. 6. 3. 17:10경 위 학교 체육관에서 위 학교 스포츠 탐구반 방과 후 활동 중 사이드스텝 기록측정을 하다가 좌측 무릎이 꺾여 전방십자인대 파열상을 입었다. 2) 원고 A은 이 사건 사고와 관련하여 피고를 상대로 학교안전법에 따른 요양급여를 청구하였고, 피고는 이 사건 사고가 학교안전법상 학교안전사고에 해당함을 인정하여 요양급여를 지급하였다.

C. As a result of the appraisal of the Plaintiff A’s remaining knee injury, the Plaintiff’s appraisal of the knee injury is assumed to have lost the permanent labor force of approximately 9.7% on the left-hand snee by applying mutatis mutandis to Section IV-1/3 of Section IV-1 of Section IV-1 of Section IV-3 of Section IV-1 of the School Safety Act. The appraisal was presented to the effect that, in applying Table 2 of the School Safety Act, there is no lecture room for the left-hand snee in the face-hand snee examination, but the snee in the face-to-face snee in the face-to-face snee examination (the difference between about 1m in the right-hand side, the right-hand side, and about 5m in the face-to-face left-hand side in the face-hand seker radiation examination).

【Ground for Recognition: Results of the absence of dispute, descriptions of Gap evidence 1, 5, and 16, and results of the court’s commission of physical examination to the director of the National Tolian University Hospital.

2. Occurrence of liability to pay mutual aid benefits;

(a) relevant legislation;