1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the dismissal of some of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【Disposition Order of the Financial Supervisory Commission’s transfer of contracts” under the second 9th 【Disposition of the Financial Supervisory Commission’s transfer of contracts” means a decision of the Financial Services Commission.

Of the fifth Schedule, the phrase “162,487,419” in the aggregate of the insurance proceeds to “162,485,410” shall be deemed “162,485,410.

Under the 5th page, the 3rd class’s “value-added tax, etc.” shall be limited to value-added tax, and shall be limited to such value-added tax

The 7th parallels 7 to 7th parallels are as follows:

2) The following circumstances are acknowledged to show each statement in Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 in the above facts. ① The defendant has long been an insurance solicitor since 2001 to 2014 (except for 2004) as business income and has reported the amount of income as business income, and the defendant's husband, as a gold-line engineer, has been working in AB during the period from 2001 to 2014, total of 374,484,390 won (annual average of approximately 26,00,000,000 won, around 46,00,000 won, and around 200,000 won before the conclusion of the insurance contract of this case; ② The defendant has maintained the insurance performance of the insurance contract of this case, including the insurance premium of this case, which is similar to the insurance premium of this case, and the defendant could not conclude that the insurance contract of this case had been paid more than 30 days prior to the date of the insurance contract of this case.