1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited or part of the reasoning of the judgment is added. Thus, the court cites this case by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

According to the "each entry" of the last 4th sentence of the judgment of the first instance, "A" shall be added to the entry of the evidence No. 21 and the result of the request for the appraisal of medical records to the Korean Medical Association."

The judgment of the court of first instance states that “The Korean Medical Association” side of Defendant A’s “brightnessd ...” is appropriate for each seven-day hospitalization for the period of hospitalization from January 25, 2012 to February 18, 2012; the period of hospitalization from November 1, 2012 to November 28, 2012; the period of hospitalization from January 10 to January 30, 2013; the period of hospitalization from January 30, 2013 to November 12, 2013; and the period of hospitalization from October 30 to November 12, 2013 to November 5, 2014.”

The following parts are added at the end of the fifth instance judgment. On the other hand, at the time of entering into the instant insurance contract, the Appointed B and Defendant A stated that the Plaintiff was a one-time life insurance of another insurance company, and did not notify the Plaintiff of the fact that they subscribed to the instant insurance contract with four other companies covering risks similar to the instant insurance contract.

The part of the 8th judgment of the first instance shall be deleted from 9 to 12.

No. 10 of the first instance judgment No. 14 was written on the 7th day of the first instance judgment with the “written evidence No. 14” as the “written evidence No. 14 and the result of the request for the appraisal of medical records to the Korean Medical Association.”

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.