Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 17, 2017, the Defendant, at around 05:45, committed soup, a soup room of “D” located in Busan Dong-gu, Busan, for the purpose of committing an indecent act against the victim E (the 24 years old), who was divingd at that place, and committed an indecent act on the part of the victim by using the victim’s resistance impossible condition in a way that the victim’s birth was boomed by his own cause.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in the above paragraph 1, committed an indecent act on the part of the victim F (the 25 years old), who was divingd by the above E (the 25 years old), committed an indecent act on the part of the victim by taking advantage of the victim’s resistance impossibility condition by drinking the victim’s desire to commit an indecent act on the part of the victim, and driving the victim’s sexual organ with another hand.

[Defendant and defense counsel argued that there is no fact that the defendant intentionally committed an indecent act against each victim as stated in the judgment.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant intentionally committed an indecent act against each victim as stated in its reasoning.

The defendant and defense counsel are without merit.

(1) The victims and witnesses have appeared as witnesses in this court and taken an oath, and have intentionally contacted with the defendant's specific indecent act.

The details of the judgment were written in detail.

The contents are consistent with each of the statements and main contents in the investigative agency.

There is no contradiction between each statement and each statement, and each statement is highly believed in light of the legal attitude of statement.

There is no motive for the victims and witnesses to go to the criminal defendant who has no awareness of being a sexual offender while taking charge of the punishment for perjury.

(2) CCTV images are all recorded by the accused.

The defendant asserts that he did not engage in self-defense at the time, but did not panty conspiracy and separated it. However, the specific attitude of the defendant that was recorded in CCTV is that he did not do so.