logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.08.23 2016나55452
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Defendant against A who ordered payment in excess of the following money among the judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the modification or addition as stated in paragraph (2) below, and therefore, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part to which the correction or addition is made shall be as follows: 2.B. (3) [2.12 to 4.2] of the first instance court:

(B) The Defendant asserts that, at the time of the accident, the Plaintiff’s negligence is at least 70% since the instant traffic accident occurred while the Plaintiff’s bridge was coming out of the yellow domin line, which is the boundary of the lane from the side, the location of the Plaintiff’s ground for accident No. 3, and the Plaintiff’s ground for appeal that, at the time of the accident, the Plaintiff’s fault is at least 70%.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged in light of the aforementioned evidence and the entire purport of oral argument are as follows: (i) even if the Defendant’s motion pictures No. 4-4 of evidence No. 4, which were alleged to be the form at the time of the accident, the length of the studio is almost the same from the studio to the yellow-ray, which is the boundary of the lane from the 14-year-old female students at the time of the accident; and (ii) it is difficult to view that the studio of the bridge, except the upper half of the body part of the Plaintiff A, a female student at the 14-year-old age-old at the time of the accident, was exposed to the shock of the roadway as the Defendant’s shock point as claimed by the Defendant; and (iii) H, a police officer, at the time of the accident, testified to the effect that “A was infected with a concrete protective wall that is not the road floor at the time of the accident” in the first instance trial, and (iv) At the time the police officer was transferred to the hospital (H). 2).

arrow