logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.05.13 2015고단6192
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,00.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 8, 2015, around 03:20 around 03:20 on the part of the Defendants: (a) around I Bank Seongbuk-gu, Daegu, Daegu; (b) around the victim J (19) and the victim’s walked without permission; (c) Defendant A walked the victim’s bridge to the floor; (d) Defendant B continued to move the victim’s bridge to the victim’s alleyway; and (e) Defendant B walked the victim with the victim’s walked and walked the baby on several occasions; and (e) Defendant C was sick to the victim’s and the victim’s friendship.

knee kelelel

죽여 버린다’ 라는 등의 욕설을 하며 발로 피해자의 온몸을 수회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendants jointly put up salt panscopics in need of approximately three weeks of treatment to the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to the Defendants and J concerning each police suspect interrogation protocol

1. Statement in each police statement with respect to K, L, M, or N;

1. Each description of the investigation report (O), diagnosis report, and written statement (P);

1. Application of each of the visual Acts and subordinate statutes to each photograph;

1. The Defendants: Article 2(2) and Article 2(1)3 of the former Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (wholly amended by Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016); Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (wholly amended by Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016);

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: (a) the Defendants jointly committed an injury to the victim on the grounds of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act; (b) Defendant C was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months; (c) three years of suspension of execution; and (d) around December 28, 2013, the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 20, 2013; (b) the Defendants committed the instant crime during the suspension of execution; (c) the extent of the injury suffered by the victim is not significantly significant; (d) the Defendants made efforts to recover the damage; and (e) Defendant A and B made efforts to commit the instant crime.

arrow