logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.07.15 2016고단1864
특수절도
Text

The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended separately.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 10, 2016, around 18:55, the Defendants discovered the victim E-owned seat No. 114, which was frightly located in the DP, located in the Gwangju Mine-gu C building, and stolen this.

Defendant

A Upon reporting the network, Defendant B shall take 35,000 won in cash from the wall A.

They go back.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of each police officer against the Defendants

1. Description of the receipt of stolen goods;

1. Application of CCTV CDs video-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 331(2) and 331(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Small-scale mitigated Defendants: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants subject to suspended sentence: Six months of imprisonment; and

1. The Defendants were subject to the suspended sentence: (a) on the grounds that Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the amount of damage was limited to KRW 35,00; (b) the Defendants agreed with the injured party only by the injured party; (c) the injured party was not subject to the punishment against the Defendants; (d) the Defendants were admitted to the colleges of the side as a primary offender; and (e) the Defendants are against the mistake of the Defendants; and (e) the judgment is rendered as above.

arrow