1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases, and thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In 3rd 12, “A defendant appealed and is currently pending in the appellate trial (Seoul High Court 2018No1348),” the part of the first instance judgment as to the fraudulent conduct against the plaintiffs on November 8, 2018 (Seoul High Court 2018No1348) was maintained (Seoul High Court 2018No1348), and the part of the judgment became final and conclusive as it is by the final appeal ruling on March 14, 2019 (Supreme Court 2018Do18546).”

The 5th parallel "Plaintiff H" in the 5th parallel behavior "Plaintiff H" shall be deemed to be "Plaintiff A".

The 5th parallel 12th parallel 19th parallel 19th parallel 19th parallel 19th parallel 19th parallel 19th parallel 2th parallel 19th parallel 19

In regard to this, even if the defendant is liable for damages to the defendant, the defendant has a duty of care to make sufficient prior examinations, such as taking questions about the profit structure and hearing opinions of those with knowledge before making their investments, but neglected to do so and invested in high-income deposited each month, and in light of the defendant's position and the period of taking charge of the defendant's duties, etc., 59,330,142 won, which is the amount of the defendant's objection against the plaintiff Eul, is 197,767,140 won, and 48,126,393 won, which is the amount of damages the defendant's objection against the plaintiff Eul, shall be 160,421,310 won, which is the amount of damages claim by the above plaintiff, and 30% of the amount of damages claim by the plaintiffs.