The defendant is innocent.

Around April 8, 2014, the defendant in the factory room did not give money to the defendant (D) for the question that the defendant (D) has paid a total of KRW 94,200,00 to the defendant (D) in terms of protection expenses, and there is a fact that the defendant in the factory gave money to F. However, the defendant testified that "I employed F as an employee on the ground that it is necessary to do so." ② that the defendant (D) has failed to wear or take a witness for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual Bribery), and that the prosecutor asked the defendant (D) for the testimony that "I will not give money to the defendant (D)" and "I will not give money to the defendant (D)," and "I will not give testimony that I will not give money to the defendant (D)," and "I will not give testimony to the defendant (D) at the time of his/her testimony."

However, while operating illegal sexual traffic business establishments, the defendant paid money to F who introduced D as drinking and protection expenses, by placing D the house at the floor of the business establishment and assaulting employees, while putting D over organized violence over about 10 times.

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that D did not incur any damage due to D’s failure or trial expenses, and D’s failure was paid money to D under the pretext of protection expenses, not to pay money to D’s employee, but to F pay money for the monthly salary.

Non-crimes

1. The records of this case alone lack to recognize the Defendant’s testimony as not guilty, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and rather can recognize the following facts.

(1) The testimony shall be made to D.