Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won.

If the above defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 28, 2014, Defendant A appeared as a witness of the above court’s loan litigation No. 2013Na 21640, which was brought by the Daegu Suwon District Court located in the same Dong-gu, Daegu, Daegu, and filed against B.

The defendant's representative, "the witness shall have a permanent domicile of the sale contract."

I cannot answer the question "..."

“Statement” and “A statement of the above fact shall be prepared by the witness.”

It does not regard the content “to read” and affix a seal to the question “.”

The testimony is called "," and the contents of the above fact-certification are required to be prepared.

“The copy of the certificate of the above fact shall be consistent with the seal of the witness, and the content shall not be memoryed as to which the witness has prepared.

There is no document stating that the witness will be able to be able to be able to write.

“The testimony was made,” and the Defendant’s agent’s letter of confirmation of the above fact need to be consistent with the seal of the witness.

In the physical appearance of “,” “A witness was marked, but the content is not that of the witness.

It is necessary to give testimony to "," and "a written confirmation of the above fact shall be prepared by the plaintiff on December 2012 and affixed a seal to the witness."

He had prepared the Plaintiff’s husband, and requested the witness to affix his seal on the physical drinking “..... the Plaintiff’s husband has affixed his seal.”

“A witness has testified to the Defendant, and whether there is a direct statement on the part of the Plaintiff.”

The testimony “for example” was made to the question “.”

However, in fact, the above contract for sale in lots was delivered to G upon the receipt of the defendant F, and the above fact-finding certificate was prepared and sealed by the defendant directly by the request of G, and the defendant did not directly witness the appearance of E's conversations.

As above, Defendant 1 made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. Defendant B is in the Daegu Suwon-gu H on January 2015.