1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. At around 14:30 on September 24, 2015, Plaintiff A visited Plaintiff D members operated by the Defendant at around 14:50 on the same day, which shows symptoms showing a coloring fluence at the center of vision.

B. The Defendant measured the Plaintiff A’s symptoms at Hggg of 1.0, 1.0, 00 in the left, 18m in the left, 16m in the left, 18m in the left, and 16m in the left, and diagnosed the Plaintiff’s symptoms in light of the results of the examination, the Defendant tried to examine the Plaintiff’s symptoms, i.e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e.,

C. On September 30, 2015, where the above symptoms were not lost, Plaintiff A visited the Eanan department and received medical treatment. As a result of the examination, the eyesight was 1.0, 0.6, 0.6, 19m Hgg and 17m mgm in the left of the friendly 19m Hg and 17m in the left of the friendly east, Plaintiff A was diagnosed as a result of the examination (hereinafter “instant disease”), and was diagnosed as a result of the examination, from the F inside of the Republic of Korea on October 1, 2015.

5. At the Ganan Department, both were diagnosed of the instant disease in the same month at the Seoul Sungsung Hospital.

Plaintiff

B is the spouse of the plaintiff A.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The instant disease alleged by the Plaintiffs is a disease requiring first aid within 2 hours after the outbreak. The Defendant did not provide any medical treatment, which was caused by a dual deposit with glass body, and the Plaintiff A was at the time of treatment with the Defendant’s negligence and caused a medical accident that caused permanent disorder in eyesight.

In addition, the defendant did not explain the disease of this case to the plaintiffs and infringed the plaintiffs' right to self-determination.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff A consolation money of KRW 28,636,707, consolation money of KRW 40,000,000, total of KRW 68,636,707, and KRW 10,000,000, and delay damages for this.

3. Regarding the assertion of negligence in diagnosis.