beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a three-dimensional vehicle.
1. On May 30, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) driven the said vehicle in a state where normal operation is impossible under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.133% while under the influence of alcohol on May 30, 2014, and proceeded to turn to the left at a speed of about 40 kilometers per hour from the right edge of the Bllllung-gu in the front city, and from the right edge to the right edge of the front city at a speed of about 40 kilometers per hour.
In proceeding as above, the Defendant, as a driver, shall clearly operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the vehicle, shall not drive the vehicle at such speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others, depending on the traffic conditions of the road and the structure and performance of the vehicle, and in such cases, there is a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle in accordance with the traffic signal and prevent the accident in advance.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving in violation of the signal even though the electric traffic signal is red, and the part of the front part of the damaged vehicle Eworked by the victim D, who is faced with the normal signal from the right side of the Mamad Sloping University, to the normal signal from the right side of the mamad Bridge, was shocked with the front part of the wing Vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence, the driver of the victimized vehicle D (V. 60) for approximately 2 weeks of light fat, tension, etc., and the driver of the victimized vehicle F (V. 56) for approximately 2 weeks of light fat, tension, etc., respectively.
2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) starting from a restaurant in front of the restaurant, which is not aware of the name near the core of the trial at the end of 10.13% of the blood alcohol level at the time of the accident, in the state of being 0.133% of the blood alcohol level.