logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.04.26 2017가단256280
위자료
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,000,000 and its related amount are 5% per annum from December 15, 2017 to April 26, 2018.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 2002, the Plaintiff and C have two children under the chain after completing their marriage reporting.

B. From June 2012, C developed into an internal relationship with the Defendant, who had been working as an assistant nurse at his own hospital from around June 2012, and continued the internal relationship with the Plaintiff at any time in the officetels, etc. until the Plaintiff is discovered on September 20 of the same year.

C. The marriage between the Plaintiff and C was aggravated due to the Defendant, and all of the family members, including his children, suffered from the mental suffering and conflicts overken, and the Plaintiff filed a divorce lawsuit against C around November 2014, but did not proceed to divorce at the end of the marital counseling.

However, on November 1, 2017, the Defendant sent a text message to C, which read “only franchises, well-known,” and asked C to “I wish to see only franchises. I do not live in his/her match.” The Defendant sent the message to C, “I want to call after the lapse of time. Therefore, I want to see it. I want to do so.”

8. They sent and received 400 copies of text messages until they have sexual intercourses;

E. On the other hand, while pursuing the relationship with C, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff a text message “I am Ra, I am son (the Plaintiff and C’s children) and I am her husband who is well flicking, and I am her husband in the first place or her husband in the first place. I see what kind of son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 6, 7, and 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. A third party who has established liability for damages falls under the essence of marriage, such as where he/she intervenes in a marital life of another person, thereby causing failure of a marital life.

arrow