Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

【Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties】

1. On January 1, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime at around 21:30 on January 1, 2018, and reported at the same place of appeal at the same time on January 1, 2018, and sent to the site by E, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Western Police Station D District, who was called to pay a taxi fee to the Defendant and returned home to the Defendant, and the Defendant was able to pay the taxi fee to the Defendant, and the Defendant was able to use the said E as his hand, and the Defendant was sprinked by both hand, pusheding the said E, walking the chest back due to a spack, walkinging the chest, continuing to receive the face part of the said E from the back seat of the vehicle at his head.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. On January 2, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime around 00:00 on January 2, 2018, and committed assault, such as the wheels of F, a police officer who works for the pertinent police station, who was arrested as a flagrant offender under the above suspicion, and detained in a detention room in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seoul, on January 2, 2018, and who was arrested as a flagrant offender under the above suspicion, and who was detained in the detention room.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation of police officers' crimes and the management of suspects.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. A written statement of victims prepared by the F;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (as to attachment of patrol booms and video images);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the same Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment is against the Defendant’s depth while making a confession of the instant crime, and is the first offender.

The defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case in a contingency under the influence of alcohol, and the police officers wanted the defendant's wife.

In addition, all the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.