Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 4,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 10, 2017, at around 12:30, the Defendants, who interfered with their duties, expressed the disturbance to the “F” restaurant operated by the victim E in Y in Yasan-si, and expressed the disturbance to the large interest in drinking, followed the name-free customer’s body in the next table, followed the victim’s wife G sent out of the restaurant, and followed the victim’s wife G in this paragraph, and the police officers, upon receiving a report from G 112, sent the victim to the restaurant with the large voice of “this dog, flac, and Nman’s superior.”

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force for about one hour.

2. The Defendants, who interfered with the performance of official duties, recommended to pay the price and return home to the scene by the YY HHJ of the Hasan Police Station, which was dispatched to the site after receiving a report of 112 that it interfered with the business at the same time and place as that set forth in the preceding paragraph, Defendant A expressed that “I’s chest part is a drinking frib,” and Defendant B, at his hand, sealed I’s chest part with the fribage, ebbbb, and can be arrested as a flagrant offender who interfered with the performance of official duties.

Defendant B, at the time of warning, was released by Defendant B by her hand from her chest to her chest, was released from J’s arms by her hand, and later arrested Defendants I and J as a flagrant offender who interfered with the performance of official duties, Defendant A was faced with the face of J as her head while she took a bath.

As a result, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Each police statement made to E, J and I;

1. Each statement G and K;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing damaged photographs and CCTV images;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Formal concurrences.