The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. At around 03:00 on April 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened and intruded into the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D in the wife population C; and (b) cut off with cash of KRW 350,000, the victim-owned cash, and CCTV, the market price of which cannot be known, the Defendant used the CCTV.

B. On April 17, 2013, at around 03:05, the Defendant: (a) opened and intruded into a “G” restaurant operated by the Victim F, located near the said restaurant; and (b) stolen cash KRW 40,000, the victim’s possession, and CCTV, the market price of which cannot be known, with the victim’s body.

C. On April 17, 2013, at around 03:10, the Defendant: (a) opened and intruded into a 'I’ restaurant operated by the victim H’; and (b) stolen cash 29,000 won, which is the victim’s possession in the Kater’s treasury.

2. The evidence submitted by the judgment prosecutor alone can only be acknowledged that the defendant committed a crime of several methods identical to the commission of theft as stated in the above facts charged. It is insufficient to recognize that the defendant committed the same crime at the time and place stated in each of the above facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. According to the conclusion, since the facts charged against the defendant in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of facts constituting the crime, the defendant is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act and the summary of the judgment is publicly announced under Article 5