The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor of the gist of the grounds for appeal, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the facts charged, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, even though the defendant, in collusion with C, prepared a false marriage report for the purpose of legitimate domestic stay in Korea and acquiring Korean nationality, submitted it to the public official in charge not aware of such fact, and made records of false facts in the family relation registration system, which is the

2. Determination

A. The facts charged C (Death on August 15, 2014) introduced the Defendant, who is a single-satise residing in the Chang-gu, Chang-gu, Chang-gu, and is offered convenience for travel in China through D, and conspired to file a false marriage report for the purpose of legitimate stay in Korea and acquisition of Korean nationality.

1) On March 17, 2011, Co., Ltd. drafted a false marriage report as if there was no intention to marry in the Do Government Viewing Family Register, which is located in the Do Government-si, Gu Government-si, and then prepared a false marriage report as if there was a genuine intention to marry. The Defendant prepared the required documents, such as the Domination certificate, and submitted it to C after attaching the aforementioned required documents. Accordingly, a public official who is not aware of his/her name was married with C on March 17, 2011. Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with C to make a false report to the public official, and had C record false facts in the Domination system, the same as the original electronic records of the notarial deed, and had C keep the said Domination in collusion with C, thereby exercising the said Domination register.

B. The lower court’s determination on the lower court and the party deliberation was based on the following circumstances, ①.