Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s sole crime committed on December 15, 2014, at the mutual infinite restaurant located in the Heungdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si

“In doing so, the victim proposed to be operating a restaurant (cafeteria at the construction site) but once refused the above proposal, the victim’s refusal on the 20th day of the same month, the victim’s “H” coffee shop located in Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-si, and the victim again made a false statement on the 700-household apartment site that is newly constructed in the voice, thereby reducing the right to operate the restaurant.” On the other hand, on December 31 of the same year, the victim sent only KRW 5 million to the victim by telephone, as the expenses are required to meet the “B) one hundred million won.”

G. “Falsely speaking.” On January 5, 2015, the Defendant sent KRW 10 million as soon as the funds to prepare for the restaurant site to the victim by telephone around January 5, 2015.

H. The phrase “FEA” was false.

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to use the money for the expenses of the Nemanggent, and there was no intention or ability to use the money for the restaurant-related funds, and there was no intention or ability to return the money.

On December 31, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 5 million from the damaged person to the account under the name of the Defendant for the purpose of annual expenses, and transferred KRW 10 million to the same account as a fund for preparation for restaurant on January 5, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take the property by deceiving the victim.

2. On March 6, 2015, the Defendants’ co-crimes of the Defendants presented a proposal to operate the restaurant at the apartment reconstruction site of the apartment located in the Chungcheongnam-gu voice group I, Chungcheongbuk-gun, and through the introduction of the son, to the victim J, who was only in the above site, expressed that they would give F a license to operate the restaurant at the above site, such as the preceding paragraph, and received money under the name of deposit.