1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was an employee belonging to the Geum-ho Fire Industry Co., Ltd., and was in the course of an accident that lost balance among the materials stored on the wall’s upper part of the container, and went beyond the floor with the wall’s surface (hereinafter “the instant accident”), from January 21, 2010 to December 5, 2014, and from January 7, 2014 to December 5, 2014, the Plaintiff received medical care benefits under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “the instant approved disease”).

B. Thereafter, on February 23, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional injury to the Plaintiff’s disease with respect to the “inorganic brain and cerebral cerebral Bribery damage (foreign cerebral cerebral Bribery damage) with a detailed uncertainty without any open address.”

(hereinafter referred to as “instant additional injury and disease”). C.

On April 2, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to approve the said application on the ground that the instant additional injury to the Plaintiff is not recognized as a causal relationship with the instant accident.

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff had shocked not only on the shoulder part at the time of the instant accident, but also on the head part of his head, and subsequently shown symptoms of two copies, recognition function and memory degradation, language disorder, and behavioral disorder. Around September 2014, the Plaintiff was diagnosed for the instant additional injury as a result of the video image analysis. The said additional injury was deemed to have a proximate causal relation with the instant accident. Thus, the instant disposition was unlawful.

B. In full view of the facts acknowledged as evidence Nos. 2 and 3, the following facts may be acknowledged, taking into account the following facts: Gap evidence Nos. 2 and Eul evidence Nos. 3; the results of the physical examination commission to the director of the Daegu University Hospital; and the purport of the whole

1. After the instant accident, the diagnosis and treatment B hospital - was discharged on May 26, 2009, and was diminished from the 1m height of the private bridge.